On 5 January 2014 04:22, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Sean, > > Before everything, I'd like to thank you for insisting in making the > transition to SQLA 0.8.x. > > Since it has been uploaded to Sid, this SQLA <0.7.99 has been without > any doubt the biggest reoccurring pain in the but with the packaging of > OpenStack. Without people like you, insisting again and again, I would > have loose hope that progress could happen in OpenStack! So thanks > again, Sean. >
> We're even more into sci-fi when we see stuff like: > > pbr>=0.5.21,<1 > > Monty, did you decide you would release 1.0 with lots of backward > incompatibility? Has the topic been raised and I missed it??? I'm > convinced this isn't the case (and let's pretend it isn't, just until > the end of this message). Strictly speak, yes. More generously, this should be pbr>=0.5.21,<2 Because pbr is using semver, and 0.x has no stability guarantees, so the point when we will hit an incompatible change to a stable API is the 2 transition. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
