On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, "Sean Dague" <s...@dague.net> wrote:
>
> On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
> > <gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> >> Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
> >>
> >
> > I think it is always good to have test packages reside in
> > test-requirements.txt. So -1 on reverting that patch.
> >
> > Here [1] is a temporary solution.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Noorul
> >
> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/65414
>
> If Solum is trying to be on the road to being an OpenStack project, why
> would it go out of it's way to introduce an incompatibility in the way
> all the actual OpenStack packages work in the gate?
>
> Seems very silly to me, because you'll have to add oslo.sphinx back into
> test-requirements.txt the second you want to be considered for incubation.
>

I am not sure why it seems silly to you. We are not anyhow removing
oslo.sphinx from the repository. We are just removing it before installing
the packages from test-requirements.txt in the devstack gate. How does that
affects incubation? Am I missing something?

Regards,
Noorul

>         -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> Samsung Research America
> s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com
> http://dague.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to