On 2014/14/01 21:35, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote:
Hi Jaromir,
2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify
which node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in
the end... at least.
In the future, I'd like to enable user to have both ways available -
just decrease number and let system to decide which nodes are going
to be removed for him (but at least inform in advance which nodes
are the chosen ones). Or, let user to choose by himself.
I think the functionality to choose which node is allocated for each
role is needed to. I didn't realize how/if it is possible from the
wireframes.
For example, I have 3 racks. I want to allocate 1 node from each rack
for Controller and make other nodes Computes and then make each rack a
separate availability zone. In this case I need to specify which exact
node will become Controller.
Is it possible to do this?
Hi Vitaly,
this is excellent question. And I was rising similar concerns before. I
believe I managed to get to some compromise how we can achieve such
use-case.
In Node Profile, you are able to specify HW specs as well as node tags
(both should be already available in Ironic). So if user has Tags well
set up (for example mark desired nodes with specific tag), we should be
able re-use that tag in Node Profile definition of Controller role and
during scheduling process.
I hope that in time we will be able to get to smoother experience ;)
Cheers
-- Jarda
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
