I think I agree with you John. Micromanaging the common library just makes more work. Is there any argument to not syncing everything? And do you mean cherry-picking only some of the changes in a single module?!? if that's the case then future syncing could get weird, really weird.
-Alex -----Original Message----- From: "John Griffith" <john.griff...@solidfire.com> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:48pm To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator Hey Everyone, A review came up today that cherry-picked a specific commit to OSLO Incubator, without updating the rest of the files in the module. I rejected that patch, because my philosophy has been that when you update/pull from oslo-incubator it should be done as a full sync of the entire module, not a cherry pick of the bits and pieces that you may or may not be interested in. As it turns out I've received a bit of push back on this, so it seems maybe I'm being unreasonable, or that I'm mistaken in my understanding of the process here. To me it seems like a complete and total waste to have an oslo-incubator and common libs if you're going to turn around and just cherry pick changes, but maybe I'm completely out of line. Thoughts?? John _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
