Looking good, let me know if I can be of help to make some high-fidelity mockups.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Jay Dobies <jason.dob...@redhat.com> wrote: > This is a really good evolution. I'm glad the wireframes are getting > closer to what we're doing for Icehouse. > > A few notes... > > On page 6, what does the Provisioning Status chart reflect? The math > doesn't add up if that's supposed to reflect the free v. deployed. That > might just be a sample data thing, but the term "Provisioning Status" makes > it sound like this could be tracking some sort of ongoing provisioning > operation. > > What's the distinction between the config shown on the first deployment > page and the ones under "more options"? Is the idea that the ones on the > overview page must be specified before the first deployment but the rest > can be left to the defaults? > > The Roles (Resource Category) subtab disappeared but the edit role dialog > is still there. How do you get to it? > > Super happy to see the progress stuff represented. I think it's a good > first start towards handling the long running changes. > > I like the addition of the Undeploy button, but since it's largely a dev > utility it feels a bit weird being so prominent. Perhaps consider moving it > under scale deployment; it's a variation of scaling, just scaling back to > nothing :) > > You locked the controller count to 1 (good call for Icehouse) but still > have incrementers on the scale page. That should also be disabled and > hardcoded to 1, right? > > > > > On 01/16/2014 08:41 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes >>> and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. >>> >>> http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/ >>> 2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf >>> >>> Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if >>> you find something what is missing which is critical for the first >>> release (or that we are implementing a feature which should not have >>> such high priority), please speak up now. >>> >>> The wireframes are very close to implementation. In time, there will >>> appear more views and we will see if we can get them in as well. >>> >>> Thanks all for participation >>> -- Jarda >>> >>> >> These look great Jarda, I feel like things are coming together here. >> >> --Hugh >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- *Steve Doll* Art Director, Mirantis Inc. sd...@mirantis.com Mobile: +1-408-893-0525 Skype: sdoll-mirantis
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev