On 20 January 2014 18:10, Alan Kavanagh <alan.kavan...@ericsson.com> wrote: > +1, that is another point Rob. When I started this thread my main interest > was disk and then firmware. It is clear we really need to have a clear > discussion on this, as imho I would not be supportive or lease baremetal to > tenants if I can not guarantee the service, otherwise the cost of risking > tenants to adverse attacks and data screening are far greater that the > revenue generated from the service. When it comes to the tenants in our DC we > consider all tenants need to be provided a guarantee of the baremetal service > on the disk, loaders etc etc, otherwise its difficult to assure your customer.
I think LXC/openVZ/Docker make pretty good compromises in this space BTW - low overhead, bare metal performance, no root access to the hardware. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
