On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently known as Role (= Resource Category).
This indeed a bit confusing, I think Role has mostly been rejected and I've seen Resource Category used the most since.
So far suggested terms: * Role * - short name - plus points - quite overloaded term (user role, etc)
-1 for Role, I don't think short is a good enough reason.
* Resource Category * - pretty long (devs already shorten it - confusing) - Heat specific term
+0, I'ge gotten used to this, its quite long, but its not that bad.
* Resource Class * - older term
-0, this strikes me as confusing as what we are defining now is somewhat different to what a Resource Class was. However, if we can clear it up this name is otherwise fine.
Are there any other suggestions (ideally something short and accurate)?
I'll throw out a couple to start ideas - - Resource Role (people seem to like Resource and role! ;-) ) - Resource Group - Role Type _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
