Hi, My concern is that if from some reason the driver implementer would like to reflect the name also in the backend device, than an update should also be calling the driver. Using readable names also makes sense on the back-end device.
-Sam. From: Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 11:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com<mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com>> wrote: Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name 'static-iamges', 'static-pages', rather then operate on ids. +1 2) I think updating the name is useful as well, but just on DB level, so there is no point in calling the driver and communicating with the backend. +1 Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Avishay Balderman <avish...@radware.com<mailto:avish...@radware.com>> wrote: Hi L7Policy holds a list of L7rules plus 1 attribute: "name" . Questions: 1) Do we need to have this name attribute? 2) Do we want to allow update operation of the name attribute? Do we need to invoke the driver when such update occurred? Thanks Avishay _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
