2014-02-11 16:14 GMT+01:00 Anita Kuno: > On 02/11/2014 04:57 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: >> Hi Mark and Anita, >> >> could we declare stable/havana neutron gate jobs good enough at this point? >> There are still random failures as this no-op change shows >> https://review.openstack.org/72576 >> but I don't think they're stable/havana specific. ...
> I will reaffirm here what I had stated in IRC. > > If Mark McClain gives his assent for stable/havana patches to be > approved, I will not remove Neutron stable/havana patches from the gate > queue before they start running tests. If after they start running > tests, they demonstrate that they are failing, I will remove them from > the gate as a means to keep the gate flowing. If the stable/havana gate > jobs are indeed stable, I will not be removing any patches that should > be merged. As discussed on #openstack-infra last week, stable-maint team should start looking more closely at Tempest stable/havana branch and Matthew Treinish from Tempest core joined the stable-maint team to help us there. In the meantime, we need to do something more urgently, there are remaining failures showing up frequently in stable/havana jobs which seem to have been fixed or at least improved on master: * bug 1254890 - "Timed out waiting for thing ... to become ACTIVE" causes tempest-dsvm-* failures resolution unclear? * bug 1253896 - "Attempts to verify guests are running via SSH fails. SSH connection to guest does not work." based on Salvatore's comment 56, I've marked it as Won't Fix in neutron/havana and opened tempest/havana to propose what Tempest test or jobs should skip for Havana. Please chime-in in the bug if you have suggestions. Cheers, Alan _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev