+1
Should we use VERB_NOUN pattern? Or relax it for some obvious? I can't figure a
good VERB_NOUN for HTTP. REQUEST_HTTP is dull.
BTW it's interesting that we assume that a service can contain only actions of
the same type.
DZ>
On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Nikolay Makhotkin <nmakhot...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Agree, I don't see any thing that makes sense with words 'REST' and 'API' too.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Renat Akhmerov <rakhme...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I’m proposing to rename these two action types REST_API and MISTRAL_REST_API
> to HTTP and MISTRAL_HTTP. Words “REST” and “API” don’t look correct to me, if
> you look at
>
> Services:
> Nova:
> type: REST_API
> parameters:
> baseUrl: {$.novaURL}
> actions:
> createVM:
> parameters:
> url: /servers/{$.vm_id}
> method: POST
>
> There’s no information about “REST” or “API” here. It’s just a spec how to
> form an HTTP request.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @ Mirantis Inc.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Nikolay
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
