We do use the term DSL, I invite you guys to clarify, how exactly. Based on the terminology from [1], it's not part of the model, but the language that describes the model in the file. And theoretically this may be not the only language to express the workflow. Once the file is parsed, we operate on model, not on the language.
I am afraid we are breaking an abstraction when begin to call things DSLWorkbook or DSLWorkflow. What is the difference between Workbook and DSLWorkbook, and how DSL is relevant here? [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mistral, DZ> On Feb 26, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Renat Akhmerov <rakhme...@mirantis.com> wrote: > I don’t see any issues with term DSL (Domain Specific Language). This is > really a language which 'workbook definitions’ are written in. > > Dmitri, could you please provide more details on why you question it? > > Thanks > > Renat Akhmerov > @ Mirantis Inc. > > > On 26 Feb 2014, at 20:12, Nikolay Makhotkin <nmakhot...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Due to the comment to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75888/1 there is a >> quiestion: >> >> Do we use term DSL or something else? >> I think the word 'DSL' is more fit thing that we call 'workbook definition', >> some text describing workflows, services, tasks and actions. And processing >> module for this also has name 'dsl'. >> >> Thoughts? Dmitri? >> >> Nikolay, >> Mirantis Inc. >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
