On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com>wrote:
> > >> >>>> >>> That for sure can be implemented. I only would recommend to implement >>> such kind of management system out of Neutron/LBaaS tree, e.g. to only have >>> client within Libra driver that will communicate with the management >>> backend. >>> >> >> [Susanne] Again this would only be a short term solution since as we move >> forward and want to contribute new features it would result in duplication >> of efforts because the features might need to be done in Libra and not >> Neutron LBaaS. >> > > That seems to be a way other vendors are taking right now. Regarding the > features, could you point to description of those? > Our end goal is to be able to move to just use Neutron LBaaS. For example SSL termination is not in Libra and we don't want to have to implement it when it is already in Neutron LBaaS. the same with L7 policies. Having the service be resilient beyond just a pair of HA proxies is a biggy for us. We cannot expect our customers to manage the LB themselves. Susanne > > Thanks, > Eugene. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
