Hi, Writing this mail after TTX suggested it in the patch review.
After talking with some Ceilometer people, it appeared that the cap on happybase (eg: <0.6) was done because of a bug upstream. This bug was, apparently, fixed in version 0.8. In Debian, we have already version 0.7 in Sid/Testing, and I uploaded version 0.8 in Experimental. It would be complicated and not desirable to revert to an earlier version, and I don't think I'd do that. For this reason, I would like to ask for a freeze exception and allow Happy base 0.8 to get in. There's 2 ways to do that: -happybase>=0.4,<=0.6 +happybase>=0.8 or: -happybase>=0.4,<=0.6 +happybase>=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 In this patch, I did the former: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82438/ however, I'd be ok to use the later. I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone, agree! :) ), then would >=0.8 or >=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 be better? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev