Of course I'm aware of that.. I'm the one who pushed it there in the first place :) But it was not the best way to handle this.. I think that the right/better approach is as suggested.
I'm planning to remove the existing ISERDriver code, this will eliminate significant code and class duplication, and will work with all the iSCSI vendors who supports both tcp and rdma without the need to modify their plug-in drivers. From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 22:47 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Refactor ISCSIDriver to support other iSCSI transports besides TCP On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com<mailto:ehar...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:07 AM, Shlomi Sasson wrote: > I am not sure what will be the right approach to handle this, I already have > the code, should I open a bug or blueprint to track this issue? > > Best Regards, > Shlomi > > A blueprint around this would be appreciated. I have had similar thoughts around this myself, that these should be options for the LVM iSCSI driver rather than different drivers. These options also mirror how we can choose between tgt/iet/lio in the LVM driver today. I've been assuming that RDMA support will be added to the LIO driver there at some point, and this seems like a nice way to enable that. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev I'm open to improving this, but I am curious you know there's an ISER subclass in iscsi for Cinder currently right? http://goo.gl/kQJoDO
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
