> On Mar 27, 2014, at 11:27 AM, "Ruslan Kamaldinov" <rkamaldi...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov > <gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> Given that I don't see the huge overlap here with Murano functionality as >> even if Solum stated that as a part of solution Heat template will be >> generated it does not necessarily mean that Solum itself will do this. From >> what is listed on the Solum page, in Solum sense - ALM is a way how the >> application build from source promoted between different CI\CD environments >> Dev, QA, Stage, Production. Solum can use other service to do this keeping >> its own focus on the target area. Specifically to the environments - Solum >> can use Murano environments which for Murano is just a logical unity of >> multiple applications. Solum can add CI\CD specific stuff on top of it >> keeping using Murano API for the environment management under the hood. >> Again, this is a typical OpenStack approach to have different services >> integrated to achieve the larger goal, keeping services itself very focused. > > > Folks, > > I'd like to call for a cross-project work group to identify approaches for > application description and management in the OpenStack cloud. As this thread > shows there are several parties involved - Heat, Mistral, Murano, Solum (did I > miss anyone?), there is no clear vision among us where and how we should > describe things on top of Heat. > > We could spend another couple of months in > debates, but I feel that focused group of dedicated people (i.e 2 from each > project) would progress much faster and will be much more productive. > > What I'd suggest to expect from this joint group: > * Identify how different aspects of applications and their lifecycle can be > described and how they can coexist in OpenStack > * Define a multi-layered structure to keep each layer with clear focus and set > of responsibilities > * End goal of the work for this group will be a document with a clear vision > of > covering areas higher up to Heat stack and how OpenStack should address that. > This vision is not clear now for TC and that is the reason they say that it > is > to big step which Murano did > * Agree on further direction > * Come to ATL summit, agree again and drink beer > > Focused group would require additional communication channels: > * Calls (Google Hangouts for instance) > * Additional IRC meetings > * Group work on design documents > > > From Murano project I'd like to propose the following participants: > * Stan Lagun (sla...@mirantis.com) > * Ruslan Kamaldinov (rkamaldi...@mirantis.com) > > Do colleagues from Heat, Solum and Mistral feel the same way and would like to > support this movement and delegate their participants to this working group? > Is this idea viable?
I will participate on behalf of Solum: Adrian Otto <adrian.o...@rackspace.com> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev