On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I would like for us to continue to use the oslo prefix in some cases, > because it makes naming simple libraries easier but more importantly > because it is an indicator that we intend those libraries to be much > more useful to OpenStack projects than to anyone else. For projects > where that isn't the case (cliff, stevedore, taskflow, tooz, etc.) we > are already choosing "non-branded" names.
I understand that, but can you point really a function that is so-damn-OpenStack-specific that if somebody would stumble upon it it would be like "pffff, what the hell!"? I don't think so. :) -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker // http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
