I think some of the objections to such patches were based on the fact that this 
is really
just a shortcut for two separate operations: create a volume from a Glance 
image, and then boot
off of that image.  Instead of monkey-patching it, we should either figure out 
a way to dynamically
configure the timeout based on image size, network conditions, etc, or we 
should just remove the shortcut
entirely, and just have people do the two steps separately (the current 
workaround for large disk images).

Best Regards,
Solly Ross

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Swartzlander" <[email protected]>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 12:08:52 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] create server from a volume 
snapshot, 180 reties is sufficient?



Options may be bad, but hardcoded values chosen arbitrarily are worse. Unless 
someone can justify why the value needs to be 180 and not 179 or 181 then it 
should be configurable. That’s my opinion at any rate. 



-Ben 





From: Lingxian Kong [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:59 AM 
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] create server from a volume snapshot, 
180 reties is sufficient? 




hi there: 





According to the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80619/ , Nova 


will wait for volume creation for 180s, the config option is rejected by 


Russell and Nikola. But the reason I raise it up is, we found the server 


creation failed due to timeout in our deployment, with LVM as Cinder 


backend. 





So, I wander is 180s really suitable here? Are there some guidences 


about when should we add an option? But at least, we should not avoid an 


option, just because of the existing overwhelming number of them, right? 





Thoughts? 











-- 


--------------------------------------- 


Lingxian Kong 


Huawei Technologies Co.,LTD. 


IT Product Line CloudOS PDU 


China, Xi'an 


Mobile: +86-18602962792 


Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] 

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to