On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Jay Dobies wrote: > On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > > tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose: > > bnemec > > greghaynes > > jdon > > I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise > to wield the awesome power of +2 responsibly. I appreciate being > nominated :) >
I am also comfortable with performing at least 3 reviews daily and would only use my new found powers responsibly. Thanks! > > > > On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones <c...@tenshu.net> wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> +1 for your proposed -core changes. > >> > >> Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day > >> rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified no. > >> > >> I think we've established an agile approach to the member list of -core, so > >> if there are a one or two people who we would have added to -core before > >> the > >> goalposts moved, I'd say look at their review quality. If they're showing > >> the right stuff, let's get them in and helping. If they don't feel our new > >> goalposts are achievable with their workload, they'll fall out again > >> naturally before long. > > > > So I've actioned the prior vote. > > > > I said: "Bnemec, jdob, greg etc - good stuff, I value your reviews > > already, but..." > > > > So... looking at a few things - long period of reviews: > > 60 days: > > | greghaynes | 121 0 22 99 0 0 81.8% | > > 14 ( 11.6%) | > > | bnemec | 116 0 38 78 0 0 67.2% | > > 10 ( 8.6%) | > > | jdob | 87 0 15 72 0 0 82.8% | > > 4 ( 4.6%) | > > > > 90 days: > > > > | bnemec | 145 0 40 105 0 0 72.4% | > > 17 ( 11.7%) | > > | greghaynes | 142 0 23 119 0 0 83.8% | > > 22 ( 15.5%) | > > | jdob | 106 0 17 89 0 0 84.0% | > > 7 ( 6.6%) | > > > > Ben's reviews are thorough, he reviews across all contributors, he > > shows good depth of knowledge and awareness across tripleo, and is > > sensitive to the pragmatic balance between 'right' and 'good enough'. > > I'm delighted to support him for core now. > > > > Greg is very active, reviewing across all contributors with pretty > > good knowledge and awareness. I'd like to see a little more contextual > > awareness though - theres a few (but not many) reviews where looking > > at how the big picture of things fitting together more would have been > > beneficial. *however*, I think that's a room-to-improve issue vs > > not-good-enough-for-core - to me it makes sense to propose him for > > core too. > > > > Jay's reviews are also very good and consistent, somewhere between > > Greg and Ben in terms of bigger-context awareness - so another > > definite +1 from me. > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev