于 2014年04月10日 16:40, John Garbutt 写道: > Apologies, that came out all wrong... > > On 10 April 2014 09:28, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: >> I think writing this up as a nova-spec is going to make this process >> much easier: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Nova >> >> It will save you having to re-write your document once you want to >> submit a blueprint, and we can all see each others comments in gerrit, >> and more clearly see how things change and evolve. The way the >> template in nova-spec works, it should also help you with structuring >> your argument. > Thats just want I would find easier, its just a suggestion. > >> Please don't design assuming a single vendor solution, that is sure to >> get rejected (at least my me) at the blueprint review stage. You might >> want a different vendor in each AZ to isolate you from failures due to >> vendor bugs, if you are digging for a use case. > I guess thats a tenant use case, I got confused reading through those. > >> I still can't see a clear description of the "tenant" use cases, I >> still think thats the key to getting agreement here, and getting >> useful feedback at the summit. Not sure I understand the tables, they >> seem a bit confusing/distracting. > Sorry, forgot to mention, you are making good progress here. But, > given the loop we are going around here, I think agreeing the "ideal" > use cases, then looking at the detail, and looping back to see if > everything "works" is probably the right approach. Other ideas > welcome! > > Once there are the use cases, given all the Config vs API debates, I about use cases, i might have different picture in my head , i.e how do you think this:
tenant user want to pick up a PCI acceleration card with MD5 and RC6 encryption/hash support. 1. is this the use case you are look for? 2. what other information should be add to this use-case? and any other suggestion? Yongli he > would look at the pure data flow, in a Config/API agnostic way. > Agreeing the info needed from the user, then in the VIF driver, then > in between, etc. We should be able to agree on that, before returning > to the host aggregates API vs something new API vs more config debate. > Right it doesn't seem to be clear what is required, so its hard to > know what the best approach is, compared to other features we already > have in Nova. > > At the moment I am struggling to see the whole picture, getting the > general idea clear before the summit would be awesome, so we can > discuss how to stage the implementation, deal with backwards > compatibility, etc. > > Thanks, > John > >> On 10 April 2014 09:14, yongli he <yongli...@intel.com> wrote: >>> 于 2014年04月10日 15:59, Irena Berezovsky 写道: >>> >>> Hi Robert, >>> >>> Thanks a lot the inputs you posted in the doc. >>> >>> I have raised there few questions and added use case for High Availability. >>> >>> Another concern I have is regarding the assumption that there is no case to >>> mix different vendor cards in the setup. I think that mixing Cisco and Intel >>> or Mellanox cards does not make sense, but Intel and Mellanox cards can >>> coexist. At least for my understanding, but I may be wrong, both Intel and >>> Mellanox take HW VEB (HW embedded switch) approach. >>> >>> 1. open to mail list. >>> 2. admin/usr won't mixing Intel/Cisco/Mellanox card...., does not mean we >>> should disable it, or don't give a chance. >>> 3. i raise couple of question and questioning the aggregate solution. see >>> inline comments. >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit >>> >>> Yongli He >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Irena >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 11:11 PM >>> To: Irena Berezovsky; Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); Robert Kukura; He, Yongli >>> (yongli...@intel.com); Itzik Brown; beag...@redhat.com >>> Subject: Re: PCI SR-IOV use cases initial doc >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I updated the doc with some of my thoughts. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/24/14, 8:41 AM, "Irena Berezovsky" <ire...@mellanox.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have created the initial doc to capture PCI SR-IOV networking use cases: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit >>> >>> >>> >>> I have updated the agenda for tomorrow meeting to discuss the use cases. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please comment and update >>> >>> >>> >>> BR, >>> >>> Irena >>> >>> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev