> Honestly, multi provisioner support is something I think shouldn't be > done.
> if there's already a provisioner that is used for infra, > let's re-use some of that knowledge and expertise. OK, I'm convinced. :-) I was thinking one reason there is a proliferation of devstack vagrantfiles is that when people find one with a provisioner they aren't already familiar with, they tend to build from scratch with something they know. But agreed that the efforts of the community would be better focused on a single configuration, particularly one that aligns with the existing infrastructure. > The place I think plugability makes sense is in virt backends. I'd > honestly love to be able to do nested kvm for performance reasons, or an > openstack cloud for dogfooding reasons. +1 for nested virt support. ~Greg _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
