Well Ivan afaik is thinking through it, but being a community project its not 
exactly easy to put estimations or timelines on things (I don't control Ivan, 
or others).

Likely faster if u guys want to get involved.

-Josh

From: Renat Akhmerov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 at 12:35 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [taskflow] Mistral TaskFlow integration 
summary


On 15 Apr 2014, at 11:13, Joshua Harlow 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Sure, its not the fully complete lazy_engine, but piece by piece we can get 
there.

Did you make any estimations when it could happen? :)

Of course code/contributions are welcome, as such things will benefit more than 
just mistral, but openstack as a whole :-)

OK.

From: Kirill Izotov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
The whole idea of sub-flows within the scope of direct conditional transitions 
is a bit unclear to me (and probably us all) at the moment, though I'm trying 
to rely on them only as a means to lesser the complexity.

Yes, eventually it’s for reducing complexity. I would just add that it opens 
wide range of opportunities like:

  *   ability to combine multiple physically independent workflows
  *   reusability (using one workflow as a part of another)
  *   isolation (different namespaces for data flow contexts etc)

Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to