On 16 April 2014 09:15, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Robert Collins > <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: >> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well >> - it certainly addresses: >> - making design work visible >> - being able to tell who has had input >> - and providing clear feedback to the designers >> >> I'd like to do the same thing for TripleO this cycle.. >> >> I'm thinking we can just add docs to incubator, since thats already a >> repository separate to our production code - what do folk think? > > +1 from me. > > Think I'd prefer a separate repo for tripleo-specs though. > > One thing that I don't think I saw called out specifically in the > nova-specs thread was about keeping these spec and design documents > updated. I'm guessing the plan around that would just be to submit > updates in gerrit as patches, and then we can all review the updates > as well. I think it's important that we try to keep them up to date > and accurate as possible.
So with the consistent 'and lets have a specs repo' response - cool. Can I get a volunteer to get it setup, please? -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev