On 04/22/2014 08:24 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com > <mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:00 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > Several folks have submitted python-novaclient blueprints to nova > > specs for the Juno Release [0][1], but since python-novaclient isn't > > part of the integrated release this doesn't really make sense. > > Furthermore the template we have has sections that make no sense for > > the client (such as 'REST API impact'). > > > > > > So how should we handle python-novaclient blueprints? Keep them in > > nova-specs in a separate directory? Separate repo? > > > > > > I think generalize the nova-specs repo from a repo for blueprints for > > just nova to a repo for all 'compute program' blueprints. Right now > > that would just cover nova and python-novaclient, but may include > > other repositories in the future. > > > Here is a proof of concept: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89725/
John originally mentioned this on the review, but Phil and I both seem to agree. Most novaclient work can just be a work item of a nova blueprint. How about we just handle it that way? I don't really expect any major work in novaclient beyond basic support of new APIs. It seems that the major new work in this area is going into creating a common client. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev