On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Anne Gentle <a...@openstack.org> wrote: > > I believe that UX and DevEx are different areas of expertise and OpenStack > could benefit more from a separate focused DevEx program >
Agreed. > I'm not sure Dean's proposal is quite "DevEx" though, and I don't know if > a rename alone would take care of what I think it is. > > - SDK maintenance and testing > - App-dev focus on docs > - Focus on improving automation tasks with unified CLI > - Processes and governance that could be separate from contrib devs > - Releases separate from the every six month timed release in order to > serve app devs better with quicker turnaround (similar to the CLIs now) > - Integrated client with the goal of eliminating the client-per-project > mess > > Dean, what do you think of these ideas? Is there enough in common with the > CLI user and app dev to consider this DevEx umbrella the program? Do you > plan to get rid of <project>-clients, and does it make sense to do so? Also > how do you plan to transition away from DevStack PTL role, have you found a > replacement? > Anne, this is why you are a writer and I am not. ;) I may steal that list... What you have listed fits with what I see happening as the Client Tools adds the SDK projects (#1 and 2). #3, 5 and 6 are already goals for OSC[1]; and #4 is what we are here talking about now. [1] I expect OSC to switch to use the Python OpenStack SDK as it becomes ready rather than attempt to salvage the existing client libs. dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev