I think the plan is to release all the raw results of this to the public as well-- meaning that it should be possible to come up with a "representative average" per organization, as well as several other ways to interpret the data. Right now, the emphasis is just to gather the data. We can decide how to interpret it later.
There's a reason this survey is not anonymous. :) Thanks, Stephen On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Adam Harwell <adam.harw...@rackspace.com>wrote: > I'd like to add that size of the organization (or really, size of the > development team) that is voting in this quiz does not directly correlate > to size of customer base. If there were any weighting happening, I'd hope > these answers would be weighted by size of user base, since really it is > the users' interests we are all trying to represent, not our own! > > --Adam > > On 5/6/14 2:16 PM, "Jorge Miramontes" <jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com> > wrote: > > >I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a > >representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each > >use case to capture extra thoughts. > > > >I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely > >varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*, since that is the > >supposed purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding > >which use-cases matter *to our customers*, so there should be no real > >variance for what I would vote versus what my teammates would vote, since > >we have the same customersŠ > > > > > >Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of > >large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is > >being used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes > >for smaller companies so that we do not alienate them from further > >voting/discussions? > > > >Cheers, > >--Jorge > > > > > > > > > >On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote: > >>> Sam, > >>> > >>> I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct? > >>> I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat least > >>> I'd hope! > >> > >>I'd hope not! :) > >> > >>Even within the same organization or company, we all have different > >>ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things "in the > >>cloud", and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of > >>things. > >> > >>I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself > >>fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights. > >> > >>Best, > >>-jay > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >OpenStack-dev mailing list > >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Stephen Balukoff Blue Box Group, LLC (800)613-4305 x807
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
