On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@enovance.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Le vendredi 18 avril 2014, 17:28:04 Victor Sergeyev a écrit : >> During Icehouse release cycle our team has been working on splitting of >> openstack common db code into a separate library blueprint [1]. At the >> moment the issues, mentioned in this bp and [2] are solved and we are >> moving forward to graduation of oslo.db. You can find the new oslo.db code >> at [3] > > There was a discussion recently about the "oslo" namespace. Sorry, but I don't > remember the decision. > > Should the new module be called "oslo.db" or "olsodb"? > > (I would prefer "oslodb", it avoids issues with the "oslo" package.)
Since we think we have been able to solve all of the issues we were having with namespace packages before, and renaming the existing libraries using the namespace package would introduce complex backwards compatibility issues (how would we update the code used by old versions of apps?), we decided to go ahead and keep using the namespace package. Doug > > Victor (Stinner aka haypo) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
