I was just about to respond to that in the session when we ran out of time. I would vote for simply insisting that VMs run without the privacy extension enabled, and only permitting the expected ipv6 address based on MAC. Its primary purpose is to conceal your MAC address so that your IP address can't be used to track you, as I understand it, and I don't think that's as relevant in a cloud environment and where the MAC addresses are basically fake. Someone interested in desktop virtualisation with Openstack may wish to contradict me... -- Ian.
On 15 May 2014 09:30, Shixiong Shang <sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, guys: > > Nice to meet with all of you in the technical session and design session. > I mentioned the challenge of privacy extension in the meeting, but would > like to hear your opinions of how to address the problem. If you have any > comments or suggestions, please let me know. I will create a BP for this > problem. > > Thanks! > > Shixiong > > > *Shixiong Shang* > > *!--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---!* > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
