----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Benton" <blak...@gmail.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 2:48:37 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit > > >3. OpenStack itself should ( its own Compute Node/L3/Routing, Controller > ) have (5 nine capable) reliability. > > Can you elaborate on this a little more? Reliability is pretty deployment > specific (e.g. database chosen, number of cluster members, etc). I'm sure > nobody would disagree that OpenStack should be reliable, but without > specific issues to address it doesn't really give us a clear target. > > Thanks, > Kevin Benton
I think this comment applies equally to the other items listed. There seemed to be agreement at the BoF that one of our key tasks/challenges is to boil down such high level NFV requirements to create actionable feature requests/proposals in the context of OpenStack. Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
