Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> writes: > James E. Blair wrote: >> openstack/oslo-specs -> openstack/common-libraries-specs > > I understand (and agree with) the idea that -specs repositories should > be per-program. > > That said, you could argue that "oslo" is a shorthand for "common > libraries" and is the code name for the *program* (rather than bound to > any specific project). Same way "infra" is shorthand for > "infrastructure". So I'm not 100% convinced this one is necessary...
"data-processing-specs" has been pointed out as a similarly awkward name. According to the programs.yaml file, each program does have a codename, and the compute program's codename is 'nova'. I suppose we could have said the repos are per-program though using the program's codename. But that doesn't actually help someone who wants to write a swift-bench spec know that it should go in the swift-specs repo. I'm happy to drop oslo from the rename list if Doug wants to mull this over a bit more. The only thing I hate more than renaming repos is renaming repos twice. I'm hoping we can have some kind of consistency, though. People are in quite a hurry to have these created (we made 5 more for official openstack programs yesterday, plus a handful for stackforge). -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
