Too late. I just approved the specification. I don't think there is any need for reverting the blueprint and just updating the topic in the patch.
Please have a look at Freescale CI - logs are not accessible at the moment. Salvatore On 27 May 2014 18:51, trinath.soman...@freescale.com < trinath.soman...@freescale.com> wrote: > Hi- > > Sure!. Will change the topic and update you. > > Thanks a lot for the reply and review. > > Your review helps me a lot to proceed further with code. > > Thanking you .. > > - > Trinath Somanchi > ________________________________________ > From: Edgar Magana Perdomo (eperdomo) <eperd...@cisco.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:18 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1 > > My only comment is that the name of the topic should be: > > bp/fsl-sdn-os-mech-driver > > > Instead of: > bp/https > > > I guss we can pass this.. > > Edgar > > On 5/27/14, 9:23 AM, "trinath.soman...@freescale.com" > <trinath.soman...@freescale.com> wrote: > > >Hi Kyle > > > >Kindly consider my BP spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88190/) too > >for Juno1. > > > >I have been mailing the reviewer to kindly make some to to review the BP > >spec. > > > >I have code too in place for review along with working CI. > > > >The Code for review : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78092/ > > > >Kindly please do the needful. > > > >-- > >Trinath Somanchi. > > > >________________________________________ > >From: Kyle Mestery <mest...@noironetworks.com> > >Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:44 PM > >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1 > > > >Hi Neutron developers: > > > >I've spent some time cleaning up the BPs for Juno-1, and they are > >documented at the link below [1]. There are a large number of BPs > >currently under review right now in neutron-specs. If we land some of > >those specs this week, it's possible some of these could make it into > >Juno-1, pending review cycles and such. But I just wanted to highlight > >that I removed a large number of BPs from targeting Juno-1 now which > >did not have specifications linked to them nor specifications which > >were actively under review in neutron-specs. > > > >Also, a gentle reminder that the process for submitting specifications > >to Neutron is documented here [2]. > > > >Thanks, and please reach out to me if you have any questions! > > > >Kyle > > > >[1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-1 > >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron > > > >_______________________________________________ > >OpenStack-dev mailing list > >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >_______________________________________________ > >OpenStack-dev mailing list > >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev