On 06/09/2014 01:38 PM, David Kranz wrote: > On 06/02/2014 06:57 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> Towards the end of the summit there was a discussion about us using a >> shared review dashboard to see if a common view by the team would help >> accelerate people looking at certain things. I spent some time this >> weekend working on a tool to make building custom dashboard urls much >> easier. >> >> My current proposal is the following, and would like comments on it: >> https://github.com/sdague/gerrit-dash-creator/blob/master/dashboards/qa-program.dash >> >> All items in the dashboard are content that you've not voted on in the >> current patch revision, that you don't own, and that have passing >> Jenkins test results. >> >> 1. QA Specs - these need more eyes, so we highlight them at top of page >> 2. Patches that are older than 5 days, with no code review >> 3. Patches that you are listed as a reviewer on, but haven't voting on >> current version >> 4. Patches that already have a +2, so should be landable if you agree. >> 5. Patches that have no negative code review feedback on them >> 6. Patches older than 2 days, with no code review > Thanks, Sean. This is working great for me, but I think there is another > important item that is missing and hope it is possible to add, perhaps > even as among the most important items: > > Patches that you gave a -1, but the response is a comment explaining why > the -1 should be withdrawn rather than a new patch.
So how does one automatically detect those using the gerrit query language?
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
