On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote: > Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in > that period was the main thing. The theory was if we encouraged people > to work on specs for the next release, then they'd be distracted from > fixing the bugs we need fixed in J. > > Cheers, > Michael > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Day, Phil <philip....@hp.com> wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> Not sure I understand the need for a gap between "Juno Spec approval freeze" >> (Jul 10th) and "K opens for spec proposals" (Sep 4th). I can understand >> that K specs won't get approved in that period, and may not get much >> feedback from the cores - but I don't see the harm in letting specs be >> submitted to the K directory for early review / feedback during that period ?
I agree with both of you. Priorities need to be finishing up J, but I don't see any reason not to let people post K specs whenever. Expectations just need to be set appropriately that it may be a while before they get reviewed/approved. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
