Le 01/07/2014 00:08, Stephen Balukoff a écrit : > > > Obviously, please feel free to disagree with our process and/or > decision for doing this, but I would ask that if you do, please also > do us the courtesy of explaining how we're supposed to merge code > using the gerrit system without having a PTL or core reviewers.
Gerrit doesn't require you to setup PTL for a project. It only requires to provide some -cores. As it was mentioned earlier, you can just go with some identified people with enough bandwidth for reviewing. If you want to make decisions, the common practice (even with a PTL) is to do regular IRC meetings , propose a vote and leave ATCs (people having commits) vote to the majority. If you consider you need someone for triaging blueprints and setting priority, that's of course something that a PTL could handle, but how can he make decisions without getting feedback from the team ? :-) That said, I truly appreciate that once a project becomes bigger, it requires some identified people for having the big picture of the project, if no ATCs can handle the knowledge of something huge enough. -Sylvain _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
