1. [NFV] is a tag. 2. This would appear to be a set of 'review me' mails to the mailing list, which I believe is frowned upon. 3. garyk's stuff is only questionably [NFV], I would argue, though all worthwhile patches. (That's a completely subjective judgement, so take it as you will.)
Might be a better idea in future to join the NFV meeting (which happened, as ever, 7am PST this morning) and raise it there, or in the #openstack-nfv channel on freenode (although it's a bit quiet there, admittedly). -- Ian. On 2 July 2014 05:05, Luke Gorrie <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 July 2014 10:39, Gary Kotton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are some patches that are relevant to the NFV support. There are >> as follows: >> > > Additionally, we who are building Deutsche Telekom's open source NFV > implementation will be able to make that available to the whole community > if the VIF_VHOSTUSER spec is approved for Juno. Then we could help others > to deploy this too which would be great. > > Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vif-vhostuser > > Cheers, > -Luke > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
