Hello! I've been looking at the statistics, and doing a bit of review of the reviewers, and I think we have an opportunity to expand the core reviewer team in TripleO. We absolutely need the help, and I think these two individuals are well positioned to do that.
I would like to draw your attention to this page: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt Specifically these two lines: +-------------------+---------------------------------------+----------------+ | Reviewer | Reviews -2 -1 +1 +2 +A +/- % | Disagreements* | +-------------------+---------------------------------------+----------------+ | jonpaul-sullivan | 188 0 43 145 0 0 77.1% | 28 ( 14.9%) | | lxsli | 186 0 23 163 0 0 87.6% | 27 ( 14.5%) | Note that they are right at the level we expect, 3 per work day. And I've looked through their reviews and code contributions: it is clear that they understand what we're trying to do in TripleO, and how it all works. I am a little dismayed at the slightly high disagreement rate, but looking through the disagreements, most of them were jp and lxsli being more demanding of submitters, so I am less dismayed. So, I propose that we add jonpaul-sullivan and lxsli to the TripleO core reviewer team. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev