Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +0000, Tim Bell wrote: >> It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along >> with losing a place to continue the discussions even if we are not >> expecting to see code in Juno. > > Agreed, that is sub-optimal to say the least. > > The spec documents themselves are in a release specific directory > though. Any which are to be postponed to Kxxx would need to move > into a specs/kxxxx directory instead of specs/juno, but we don't > know what the kxxxx directory needs to be called yet :-(
The poll ends in 18 hours, so that should no longer be a blocker :) I think what we don't really want to abandon those specs and lose comments and history... but we want to shelve them in a place where they do not interrupt core developers workflow as they concentrate on Juno work. It will be difficult to efficiently ignore them if they are filed in a next or a kxxx directory, as they would still clutter /most/ Gerrit views. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
