On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Jay Dobies <jason.dob...@redhat.com> wrote: > At the meetup today, the topic of our spec process came up. The general > sentiment is that the process is still young and the hiccups are expected, > but we do need to get better about making sure we're staying on top of them. > > As a first step, it was proposed to add 1 spec review a week to the existing > 3 reviews per day requirement for cores. > > Additionally, we're going to start to capture and review the metrics on spec > patches specifically during the weekly meeting. That should help bring to > light how long reviews are sitting in the queue without being touched. > > What are everyone's feelings on adding a 1 spec review per week requirement > for cores?
You mean cores in Ironic and not the cores in the ironic-spec-core group[1] right? Either way, 1 review per week seems to be very reasonable, the minimum you can expect from a core, so +1 for the idea. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/352,members _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev