On 07/29/2014 12:12 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Sure there was some debate about what criteria were desired acceptance > when stable trees were started. Once the criteria are defined I don't > think it is credible to say that people are incapable of following the > rules. In the unlikely event that people were to willfully ignore the > agreed upon rules for stable tree, then I'd not trust them to be part > of a core team working on any branch at all. With responsibility comes > trust and an acceptance to follow the agreed upon processes.
I agree with this. If we can't trust someone on *-core to follow the stable criteria, then they shouldn't be on *-core in the first place. Further, if we can't trust the combination of *two* people from *-core to approve a stable backport, then we're really in trouble. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
