That I understand it!
Thanks for the clarification.

Edgar

From: Ryan Moats <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming


Edgar Magana <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote 
on 08/07/2014 04:37:39 PM:

> From: Edgar Magana <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: 08/07/2014 04:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming
>
> Ryan,
>
> COPS implies a common protocol to communicate with PEPs, which
> implies the same communication mechanism basically.
> So, you are implying that "endpoints" in GBP will use "different"
> protocol to communicate with "decisions" entities?

Nope, I'm saying that the members of groups are not *required* to do 
enforcement.
They *could* (based on the implementation), but calling them PEPs means they 
would *have* to.

Ryan
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to