On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon <joe.gord...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn <egl...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort >> > of >> > non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service, >> > mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all >> > projects. >> > With the effort to reduce the number of gate variants we have [0] I >> > would >> > prefer to see just ceilometer gate on both mongodb and sqlalchemy and >> > the >> > main integrated gate [1] pick just one. >> >> Just checking to see that I fully understand what you mean there, Joe. >> >> So would we: >> >> (a) add a new integrated-gate-ceilometer project-template to [1], >> in the style of integrated-gate-neutron or integrated-gate-sahara, >> which would replicate the main integrated-gate template but with >> the addition of gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilometer-mongodb(-full) >> >> or: >> >> (b) simply move gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilometer-mongodb(-full) from >> the experimental column[2] in the openstack-ceilometer project, >> to the gate column on that project >> >> or: >> >> (c) something else >> >> Please excuse the ignorance of gate mechanics inherent in that question. > > > > Correct, AFAIK (a) or (b) would be sufficient. > > There is another option, which is make the mongodb version the default in > integrated-gate and only run SQLA on ceilometer. >
Joe, I believe this last option is equivalent to making mongodb the recommended implementation by virtue of suddenly being the most tested implementation. I would prefer not to see that. Eoghan, IIUC (and I am not an infra expert) I would suggest (b) since this keeps the mongo tests within the ceilometer project only, which I think is fine from a "what we test is what we recommend" standpoint. Also, if there is a situation where a change in Nova passes with ceilometer+mysql and thus lands in Nova, but fails with ceilometer+mongodb, yes, that would break the ceilometer project's gate (but not the integrated gate). It would also indicate a substantial abstraction violation within ceilometer. I have proposed exactly this model for Ironic's deploy driver testing, and am willing to accept the consequences within the project if we break our own abstractions. Regards, Devananda _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
