On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Angus Lees <g...@inodes.org> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:11:51 AM Kevin Benton wrote: >> Is the pylint static analysis that caught that error prone to false >> positives? If not, I agree that it would be really nice if that were made >> part of the tox check so these don't have to be fixed after the fact. > > At the moment pylint on neutron is *very* noisy, and I've been looking through > the reported issues by hand to get a feel for what's involved. Enabling > pylint is a separate discussion that I'd like to have - in some other thread. >
I think enabling pylint check was discussed at the start of the project, but for the reasons you mention, it was not considered. > -- > - Gus > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
