> -----Original Message----- > From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com] > Sent: 03 September 2014 10:50 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for > Juno
<snip> > > I will follow up with a more detailed email about what I believe we are > missing, once the FF settles and I have applied some soothing creme to my > burnout wounds, but currently my sentiment is: > > Contributing features to Nova nowadays SUCKS!!1 (even as a core > reviewer) We _have_ to change that! > > N. > While agreeing with your overall sentiment, what worries me a tad is implied perception that contributing as a core should somehow be easier that as a mortal. While I might expect cores to produce better initial code, I though the process and standards were intended to be a level playing field. Has anyone looked at the review bandwidth issue from the perspective of whether there has been a change in the amount of time cores now spend contributing vs reviewing ? Maybe there's an opportunity to get cores to mentor non-cores to do the code production, freeing up review cycles ? Phil _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
