On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > Hi team, > > I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find > specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]). > > Some reasons why we may want to grant it: > > First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the > gate race. > > Rejecting it makes little sense really, as it has been commented on by a > good chunk of the core team, most of the invasive stuff (db migrations > for example) has already merged, and the few parts that may seem > contentious have either been discussed and agreed upon [3], or can > easily be addressed in subsequent bug fixes. > > It would be very beneficial to merge it so that we actually get real > testing on the feature ASAP (scheduling features are not tested in the > gate so we need to rely on downstream/3rd party/user testing for those).
This statement bugs me. It seems kind of backwards to say we should merge a thing that we don't have a good upstream test plan on and put it in a release so that the testing will happen only in the downstream case. Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev