On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson <geekinu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There > is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before, > but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then necessitated a > rebase. For those not familiar with the work, the spec[2] can shed some > more light on the scope of work for Juno. > > All the other patches from this blueprint have merged, the only remaining > patch really just needs a +W as it has been extensively reviewed and > already approved previously. This may be an easy candidate since Andrew > Laski, Jay Pipes and Dan Smith have reviewed and +2'd this already. > I am happy to sponsor this, as this is the last patch needed to finish a BP and the patch was approved once bit needed a rebase over some objects changes. The change from the approved version is pretty minor. > > Thanks, > > Mike Wilson > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103064/ > [2] > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/specs/juno/juno-slaveification.rst > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev