On 09/18/2014 04:01 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > After having gone through the whole thread and read all the concerns, > problems and reasonings, I think we should stick to requests as-is for > now and deal with this particular issue. > > Regardless of the vendorized urllib3 package, I believe requests is a > good library with an easy-to-consume API and it has solved several > problems throughout OpenStack. Not to mention it's also helpped with > making OpenStack more consistent. We've put a lot of effort to get to > this point and I don't think we should revert all that because of the > vendorized `urllib3` package. > > Cheers, > Flavio
I, at least, haven't suggested that we stop using requests. Just that we don't internally use any of the requests.packages.* stuff. The rest of the debate about the good or bad things with vendorizing, even if it is my view that it's a really bad thing, is IMO not interesting for the OpenStack project. Thomas Goirand (zigo) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
