On 09/22/2014 02:58 PM, Solly Ross wrote:
> The reason it was bounded was because we (the websockify upstream mantainers) 
> made a backwards-incompatible change (for good reasons -- it brought 
> websockify more inline with the Python standard library interfaces).
> However, OpenStack had subclassed the WebSocketProxy code, and so the change 
> would have broken OpenStack.
> 
> I did a commit a while ago that made it possible to use Nova with both the 
> newest version and the older versions, but we never bumped the max version 
> for OpenStack, even though we could.

Actually, the max version is bumped. We're testing with 0.6.0 in the
gate because of it.

        -Sean

> 
> Best Regards,
> Solly
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Doug Hellmann" <d...@doughellmann.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 1:54:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] [nova] requirements freeze       
>> exception for websockify
>>
>> On Sep 19, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to request a requirements freeze exception for websockify -
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122702/
>>>
>>> The rationale for this is that websockify version bump fixes a Nova bug
>>> about zombie processes - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1048703.
>>> It also sets g-r to the value we've been testing against for the entire
>>> last cycle.
>>>
>>> I don't believe it has any impacts on other projects, so should be a
>>> very safe change.
>>
>> Gantt, Ironic, and Nova all use websockify.
>>
>> I’m +1 on updating the minimum based on the fact that our current version
>> spec is causing us to test with this version anyway.
>>
>> However, the proposed change also removes the upper bound. Do we know why
>> that was bounded before? Have we had issues with API changes in that
>> project? Is it safe to remove the cap?
>>
>> Doug
>>
>>>
>>>     -Sean
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean Dague
>>> http://dague.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to