On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Anant Patil <anant.pa...@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > In convergence, we discuss about having concurrent updates to a stack. I > wanted to know if it is safe to assume that the an update will be a > super set of it's previous updates. Understanding this is critical to > arrive at implementation of concurrent stack operations. > > Assuming that an admin will have VCS setup and will issue requests by > checking-out the template and modifying it, I could see that the updates > will be incremental and not discreet. Is this assumption correct? When > an update is issued before a previous update is complete, would the > template for that be based on the template of previously issued > incomplete update or the last completed one? > I don't think you can assume anything about the update. What if the user just posts a totally different template? That is still a valid update. Or they post an empty template to delete the resources. -Angus > > - Anant > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
