On 09/24/2014 07:07 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Sorry for the vague subject[1]. I just wanted to commend Flavio Percoco > and the Zaqar team for maintaining poise and being excellent citizens > of OpenStack whilst being questioned intensely by the likes of me, > and others.
And I'd personally like to thank all of you for taking the time to go through the code, docs, specs and emails. It's been very helpful and it's highlighted the bads and goods of the service. Lets work on making it better. > I feel that this questioning has been useful, and will allow us to reason > about Zaqar in the future. So, I recommend that we stop questioning, > and start coding. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123750/ ;) > > If you feel that a lighter weight system with different guarantees will > serve the users of OpenStack better than Zaqar, then own up and write it. > > Meanwhile, I suggest we spend our communication bandwidth and effort > on reasoning about the bigger problem that Zaqar exposes, and which I > think Monty has highlighted in his recent thread about the big tent. > +1 Thank you, Clint Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
