On 10/02/2014 11:14 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/02/2014 11:23 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote:
As I re-read this I think maybe you have answered my question but want
to be clear. You feel that 'State' is the only term that should be
used. Based on the definitions above, that would make sense. The
complication is there are may places in the code where a variable like
'status' is used. Don't think we are going to be able to go back and
fix all those, but it would be something that is good to watch for in
reviews in the future.
I'm talking about new versions of the public APIs that get proposed,
not existing ones. Within the codebase, it would be great to use a
single term "state" for this, prefixed with a refining descriptor like
"power_", "task_", etc. But that's a lesser concern for me than our
next generation REST APIs.
Best,
-anotherjay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks for the clarification. I think the proposal is a good idea.
-theotherjay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
