If you can add and delete interfaces it seems like being able to list them is useful. You can get the info you need from the networks list when you get the instance, but “nova interface-list” seems like a useful addition if we have “interface-attach” and “interface-detach”, so in this case I think I would suggest that we leave the proxying in and implement it for nova-network as well.
I was looking for an anologue with cinder but it looks like we have a volume-attach and volume-detach there without a volume-list <server> command so if people want to kill it I’m ok with that too. Vish On Oct 2, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On 10/2/2014 4:34 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: >> os-attach-interfacees is actually a a forward port of: >> >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/attach_interfaces.py >> >> which is a compute action that is valid for both nova-network and neutron: >> >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/compute/api.py#n2991 >> >> On Oct 2, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> wrote: >> >>> The os-interface (v2) and os-attach-interfaces (v3) APIs are only used for >>> the neutron network API, you'll get a NotImplemented if trying to call the >>> related methods with nova-network [1]. >>> >>> Since we aren't proxying to neutron in the v3 API (v2.1), why does >>> os-attach-interfaces [2] exist? Was this just an oversight? If so, please >>> allow me to delete it. :) >>> >>> [1] >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/network/api.py?id=2014.2.rc1#n310 >>> [2] >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/compute/plugins/v3/attach_interfaces.py?id=2014.2.rc1 >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Matt Riedemann >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > OK so create/delete call the compute_api to attach/detach, but show and index > are calling the network_api on port methods which are neutron only, so I > guess that's what I'm talking about as far as removing. Personally I don't > think it hurts anything, but I'm getting mixed signals about the stance on > neutron proxying in the v2.1 API. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
